8 Comments
User's avatar
Andrew Sniderman 🕷️'s avatar

I’ve written about Gartner before. Similar to Gallup but tech. Much bigger than Gallup. Ever heard of the magic quadrant?

Andrew Smith's avatar

Catching up now. Is this a useful framework nowadays?

Andrew Sniderman 🕷️'s avatar

Gartner is stupid successful and it’s a circular game. We had people whose *job* was to work with Gartner to make sure we made it into the magic quadrant. For example, here’s the latest and of course Google’s got it. Pay to play https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/ai-infrastructure/google-is-a-leader-in-gartner-magic-quadrant-for-ai-infra

Bill C. White's avatar

IBM and their tabulating machines, not quite what we use: general purpose computers.

Andrew Smith's avatar

Thanks. I like to wade out until the water is juuuuust above my head, then read the comments to learn the fuller picture!

Still cool and a very important stepping stone, right?

Bill C. White's avatar

Yes indeed. There were many motivators of computing and many missed the boat.

David Perlmutter's avatar

And thus Gallup begat Crossley, Hooper, Nielsen and ultimately the Internet algorithim...

Andrew Smith's avatar

Initially, I was going to write about the Pew Research Center. It was going to be called “Pew Pew!”