Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Marginal Gains's avatar

I remember reading about a hybrid approach called exogenesis, which combines the ideas of abiogenesis and panspermia.

In this theory, the building blocks of life, such as organic molecules, may have been delivered to Earth via comets or meteorites; the actual development of life occurred through natural processes on Earth.

Would we ever know the answer to this question? If we can find life outside of Earth in the future, we will probably have a better theory around this topic.

Expand full comment
erniet's avatar

As you say, the idea of panspermia kicks the can down the road...and hence is intellectually unsatisfying. It still had to have an origin somewhere. Parsimony dictates we consider the origin to be here rather than extraterrestrial; we can't prove it either way, so the most parsimonious explanation is it arose here. The famous Miller-Urey experiment shows it's unnecessary to even invoke exogenesis (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller%E2%80%93Urey_experiment).

Interestingly, because all organisms share the same genetic code (that is, which three-nucleotide sequence codes for which amino acid) we know life on earth had only one origin point that survived to the present. This is because which three-nucleotide sequence corresponds to which amino acid is arbitrary, and it's highly unlikely all life would share that code unless we all had a single ancestor with that code.

Expand full comment
20 more comments...

No posts