For we can easily understand a machine's being constituted so that it can utter words, and even emit some responses to action on it of a corporeal kind, which brings about a change in its organs; for instance, if touched in a particular part it may ask what we wish to say to it; if in another part it may exclaim that it is being hurt, and so on. But it never happens that it arranges its speech in various ways, in order to reply appropriately to everything that may be said in its presence, as even the lowest type of man can do.
With this assertion from his 1637 treatise, philosopher René Descartes unwittingly cast a gauntlet at the feet of future generations. He posited a question that, centuries later, remains a vital and fascinating enigma in the field of artificial intelligence: Can a machine, however intricate or meticulously designed, ever truly emulate the unpredictability and dynamism of human conversation?
Descartes' speculation echoed through the generations and centuries, and l…
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Goatfury Writes to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.