12 Comments

The crazy thing is that it wasn't until the 1960s that the theory of continental drift was generally accepted.

Expand full comment

In another parallel, it took until the 1960s for the Big Bang theory to become the accepted mainstream theory as well. Both were based on movement away from an origin point in the distant past, both were proposed during the 1st half of the 20th century, and both were resolved later in the 2nd half!

Expand full comment

It's crazy how much we just accept as 'known' is less than 150 years old. People before that just didn't know.

Expand full comment

"Back in my day, we hadn't even detected gravitational waves yet!"

Expand full comment

The problem the Wegener had was the mechanism for the movement of continents. This is why it was not until the 1960s when the idea of plates in motion, which turned out to be convergent, divergent, and transform. Thus be peace of the puzzle that he had uncovered lacked only. a mechanism for it to be set in motion and that is why until the discovery of tectonic plates his ideas were an unknown piece of a much larger puzzle. Eventually, they gave rise to the idea of tectonic plates and the final view.

Expand full comment

Thanks, Stirling. Did I do all right with this history?

Expand full comment

There are a lot of pieces to the puzzle. Have you considered writing a book about the period?

Expand full comment

No!

Sorry, that was a bit strong, but I think I am very much in the "I'd prefer not to do another book" camp. I really do enjoy a daily deep dive, even if I can only go so deep.

Expand full comment

great post!

Expand full comment

Hey, thanks!

Expand full comment

Fascinating!

Expand full comment

The world sure was a bigger place back then.

BOOM!

Kicking my Monday off with a good ol' dad joke. Still got it!

Expand full comment