43 Comments

Same with ending a sentence with a preposition. There are some things up with which I will not put.

Expand full comment

I’m the same way but I read recently that it’s a bogus rule made up by textbook companies. Still the programming runs too deep.

Expand full comment

We're like a third of the way back to thees and thous!

Expand full comment

I aim to definitely support this linguistic evolution boldly. Did I right that do?

Expand full comment

Depends on the future it does. Do or do not; there is no "try"!

Expand full comment

Yoda channel boldly you did. Proud of you I am.

Expand full comment

I think Spock was an important balance for Kirk's recklessness, The others could be persuaded after a bit of a pep talk by the captain, but Spock just kept that look, with a slightly raised eyebrow if necessary.

Expand full comment

Oh yeah, Spock was always unafraid to call BS!

Expand full comment

Yes, grammar is an evolving reality, not a fossilized, unchanging relic.

Expand full comment

To be honest, I tend to just also go with what I think sounds nice. I prefer "to boldly go" as well and Kirk and Spock has a good dynamic imo. Like Fire and Water.

Expand full comment

I try to stick with proper grammar in the narrative parts of my fiction (not when a character is speaking/thinking) and non-fiction. But frankly I fudge it when something sounds so gosh darn awkward. "To boldly go" is definitely preferred.

Expand full comment

Yes! This is how language works. Do what feels right.

Expand full comment

We can't abandon grammar altogether. Communication would break down. But when writing, we need to have things sound natural, esp. when writing dialogue.

Expand full comment

Yeah, that's what I mean. Plus: we are the ones who will reshape language, and it's a living thing!

Expand full comment

Just wasn’t sure MY meaning was clear. Have a very lovely day!

Expand full comment

Same.

Expand full comment

You know, it's funny, but I'd never heard of this split infinitive nonsense until I started using ProWritingAid--so about two years ago. Now keep in my mind that I'm French, and I initially learned English when I was a kid a long, long time ago (early 70s). Heck, it's possible it was mentioned at some point back then and I just don't remember it.

Anyway, when PWA started pointing these out I was like whaaat? Are you kidding me? OK, no, I'm just gonna ignore this one LOL.

And that final line in your article was very, uhm, bold... and true 😉

Expand full comment

Alex, I learned some French when I was a kid! We're like inverts of one another (except I never got very good with French, or at least not yet).

I know of no language that has more of these silly rules than English.

Expand full comment

Oh man, French has a TON of silly rules, though they're of a different sort. I generally find English a lot easier.

One of the silliest things about French is that EVERY word has to be either masculine or feminine. And sometimes it feels so random. Why would a car be feminine (especially considering how at the time cars were invented there were only men driving them) and blender masculine (when they were initially used mostly by women)?

Ultimately, I think all languages are weird 🤣

Expand full comment

I was just having this conversation about gender in language on Thursday with one of our managers, who is Korean. Neither of us could really justify gender in language (Korean is like English in this regard), although we did think specifically about la lune and le soleil. She brought up the fact that the moon is tied to menstrual cycles, which I found fascinating and satisfying as an explanation (although it could just be speculation in this case).

Expand full comment

Sure, there are cases where it can make sense, but in others it's like WTF?

Here's another example. When the epidemic hit we started talking about the coronavirus and covid and everyone was using those words in the masculine form. That sort of came naturally, I'm guessing because virus is a masculine word, so it made sense, right? But then the "Académie Française" decided both terms should be feminine. And I'm like why???

But that's the thing with French, the Académie has last say on what is what. They do (sort of) take into account usage, but ultimately they decide what goes into the dictionary, and sometimes their decisions make no sense.

In case you're wondering, the Académie is made up of 40 (literary fiction) authors, linguists, philosophers, and scholars.

Expand full comment

That is very interesting! So, one would expect for French to evolve along very different lines than the more organic "Wild West" approach with English, or at least that's one big takeaway for me. The conventions of English probably bend more to the will of the people speaking it.

Expand full comment

More or less. It really depends on how willing the majority of people are to follow these 'rules.' People will talk however they want to talk. I still use the masculine forms for corona and covid and I know others who do as well. But there could be a shift if more people use feminine. Time will tell.

Expand full comment

So who actually wrote the opening to the show and how many drafts did they have and how many did Shatner have to stand there and record in the booth?

Similarly, Spock and Data are parallel characters who stand in for our need for exposition. I just watched the one where Data took the helm but couldn't "make it so" because he'd gotten his fingers stuck in a Chinese finger puzzle. And at the end of the show he asked Picard if he could beam a box of said finger puzzles to the Farengi ship. And Picard said yes! Haha. Prime Directive my donkey!

But back to the issue of language, our Waze often says, "Okay, drive safe!" And all I can do is imagine a safe with wheels and a steering wheel attached.

And didn't Star Trek get canceled after only 3 seasons?

Expand full comment

Wait, doesn't the Prime Directive only apply to civilizations that have not yet created a warp signature? I might be off on this, though.

I've read that there was quite a bit that went into this initial show intro.

Expand full comment

Uh, you might be right about the level of technology a civilization has before Starfleet will/won't help. I was trying to make a joke about the souring of relations between Starfleet and the HOO-mons once the finger puzzles had been disseminated and deemed to be a weapon.

Expand full comment

Oh yeah, it was a good joke! But you know that whenever we start talking about Star Trek lore, there's gonna be some nitpicking. I'm not sure which is worse for that sort of thing: Trek or Wars. Both have pretty fervent fans.

Expand full comment

Indeed.

Expand full comment

Sadly, zero. I just found out about it a few months ago! Why the school doesn’t have a mural is beyond me. Or at least paint the football field with a gigantic Starfleet emblem. Sad, so sad.

Expand full comment

Clearly, nerds do not run this school.

Expand full comment

No, not this one. 🫤

Expand full comment

Not only Spock, but perhaps all Vulcans have an excellent command of English grammar. In Voyager, Tuvok tells Captain Janeway, “It was I who made the trade.” How refreshing!

(Btw, Andrew, Gene Roddenberry went to my h.s. 😉 Yay, Star Trek!)

Expand full comment

Oh wow! He graduated in 1939, from what I'm reading. Were there lots of Roddenberry-legacy things at your school when you went there? I'm envisioning paintings or murals, statues, maybe some kind of little museum-in-a-case?

Expand full comment

Haha! Never noticed that before!

Expand full comment

“Can you imagine Leonard Nimoy’s logical voice violating an age-old convention of grammar?”

Didn’t he do so at the end of ‘Star Trek II : The Wrath of Khan”?

Expand full comment

This line?

"The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few... or the one."

Expand full comment

The epilogue right before the end credits.

https://youtu.be/LXVqSa2l6mg @ 2 min. 40 sec.

Expand full comment

Nice! I'm sure I noted this as a kid, but I likely haven't revisited this in my mind since the movie was in theaters. Whew!

Expand full comment

I suppose the opposites-attracting nature of Kirk and Spock is what has caused so many fan-fiction writers to "ship" them...

Expand full comment

"Ship" them?

Expand full comment

Portray them as a romantic couple. I learned of this term exploring fan fiction and theories for television animation, where this speculation is common. But with Kirk and Spock, it's been going on nearly since the show began in the 1960s.

Expand full comment

Oh wow, new term for me! Thanks!

Expand full comment